Sunday, January 4, 2009

Overreacting to Hamas Attacks?

Here are some early morning thoughts on Israel-Gaza. First, a "Let's Play Pretend" video exercise via Carl in Jerusalem:

Next, let's go to Noah Pollak's CNN fact-check:

On CNN a few moments ago, Christiane Amanpour, in the midst of an otherwise completely warped report on the Gaza war, said that over the past year only two Israelis were killed by Hamas rocket fire. Her point in the segment was to insinuate that Israel is overreacting to Hamas attacks that have been largely harmless. In order to do that, she had to abstain from mentioning important facts and context, such as that Hamas’ attacks in 2008 more than doubled — to 3,278 — from the 2007 number. And this figures in the six-month “lull” period, during which “only” around 100 rockets were fired. She also did not mention that the range and deadliness of Hamas’ rockets increased as well, putting around 15 percent of the Israeli population under Hamas’ missile umbrella. (The “disproportionality” fetishists also never get around to noting that Israel has conducted less than a thousand air strikes in response to over 7,000 Hamas rocket attacks since 2005.)

Thus is the history of this episode of the conflict re-written almost in real time, from one of a gathering danger to one of a boring nuisance. Oh, and eight Israelis, not two, were killed by Hamas in 2008. Amanpour’s “errors” always seem to work in one direction, don’t they?
Check Astute Bloggers for lots more on "disproportionality" and this "boring nuisance."

2 comments:

Law and Order Teacher said...

The doctrine of limited warfare/proportionality is a bankrupt theory. We tried that in Vietnam and look where that got us.

If a C-in-C is going to deploy the military it has to be all in. The military is trained to break things and kill people. Leave diplomacy to those who get paid for that.

After the military rids the area of insurgents you can go about trying to make friends. But it takes an all out effort by a professional military to win.

l_tag8 said...

Absolutely, sort out who is or isn't friendly afterwards.